Learning New tricks From Old Dogs

At a recent panel hosted by the Committee Development, Gordon Gee advocated “blow[ing] up the box” of higher education.  He rightly observes that American higher education is behind the curve in serving students, industry, and society in general.  A central issue is the structure of higher education.  Simply, higher education continues to organize itself around structures that were developed centuries ago for a much different culture.  Colleges and departments, Gee opines, are probably not the best structures for connecting consumers (i.e., students) to the world of work and society at large.  Rather, we should look to more relevant structures that can accomplish this function.  If you have been reading this blog, you may remember a discussion of “form follows function,” and how our current system is missing the mark in this regard.

What makes Gee’s remarks, well, “remarkable,” is the fact that he has been a university president at several very high profile institutions over his 40 year career.  He has seen great change (or lack thereof) in higher education.  It would be easy for him to rest on his laurels and enjoy the success he has had.  Instead, he prods the establishment to wake up and get higher education in step with the rest of society.  Hear, hear!

On the other hand, The Chronicle of Higher Education’s Beckie Supiano reported recently concerning faculty push back over new online programs at Eastern Michigan University and elsewhere.   The rub here involves unions, partnerships, ownership of program development, and faculty’s general distrust of the efficacy of online education.

Really?  This tired  litany of issues again?  Higher education must quit playing the victim role.  First, it must face the fact that “online” education is a myth.  There is only EDUCATION--technologically infused, to be sure--but in the end just one basic system of teaching and learning. The responsibility and accountability for creating, distributing, and evaluating this comprehensive system of education lies with the higher education community.  There is a variety of models to accomplish this, some of which Gee mentions.


The point here is that higher education needs to quit whining and start DOING; otherwise, some else will.  The Kaplans, Pearsons, and various corporate universities will eventually supplant the current higher ed structure by proving their ability to produce productive members of the economy and society at large.  We need to stop arguing the point among ourselves and take control of the system before it is too late.  Gordon Gee is one of the architects of the status quo.  He sees the need to change it.  So should the rest of the status quo.  Time for the young pups to learn from an old dog.  My apologies, Dr. Gee.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Purging the Past by Punishing the Present

The following item appeared recently under Quick Hits in The Chronicle of Higher Education’s Daily Briefing: Descendants of slaves are  calling for restitution  from Georgetown University based on the profits it made from a sale of 272 slaves in 1838. Apparently the university has apologized, is determining how best to make amends, and is engaging in a long-term dialogue with descendants of slaves who demand restitution.   This entire situation is a primary example of the BS that is making a mockery of higher education in America.   Christian Smith opened the can of bullshit in his piece entitled “Higher Education is Drowning in BS,” published on January 9 in CHE.   It is a scathingly accurate introduction to the silliness that pervades the higher education community, silliness that undercuts the very credibility of higher education and obviates its ability to address major societal concerns.   I have my own list of gripes, some of which appear ...
Read more

Adult Students, Non-Traditional Students, Post-Traditional Students, and Other Redundancies

Breaking news:   There is an enormous population of underserved adult students.   They are older than high school graduates; they work, have families and have limited access to higher education opportunities. Higher education needs to take action! Oh, wait, you already knew that?    Apparently so does everyone else except higher education. Higher education insiders (read: faculty, administration, researchers, and the education media) keep making this discovery almost daily.   Well, to be fair, they are making different discoveries.   One study reveals the plight of “adult students.”   Another provides a profile of “non-traditional” students.   Yet another gives us the details of “post-traditional” students (my favorite).   As a former insider, I am both embarrassed and insulted. In a recent piece in The Chronicle of Higher Education, Christian Smith cites a variety of examples of BS in higher education.   Among the more prominen...
Read more

The Basics: Where Are We and How Did We Get Here?

Yogi Berra is quoted as having said,   “If you don’t know where you are going, you’ll end up someplace else.”   That’s what this blog is all about.   It is a blend of observations, commentary, and opinion gained over forty years of experience in higher education that will provide perspectives on where higher education is today, where it is going, and how it will get to wherever it is that it is going.   A recent survey conducted by Washington-based think tank New America contends that Americans see value in higher education, but may not be happy with it. The Introduction to the report puts it succinctly: “Americans believe in the tremendous potential of higher education—but they also feel that higher education is falling short of that promise.   New America’s inaugural survey reveals a stark expectations gap between what higher education could-- and should—be and where higher education currently is.”   OK, we know where we are and we don’t li...
Read more