The Liberal Arts and General Education
Historically, the liberal arts were intended
to provide a set of foundational skills and a theoretical framework that
students could apply in the real world. This comes from the function of higher
education in early America to provide education to an elite population in an
agrarian society to prepare them to lead within that society. Education was organized by basic knowledge
units—professors and libraries.
Over a span of centuries American society
progressed from an agrarian to an industrial to a knowledge base. Accordingly the need arose for higher
education to prepare a labor force with an increasing variety of specialized
skills. To accomplish this, the liberal arts foundation of higher education
needed to be supplemented by curricula that prepared students to become
productive members of a new order. This cultural
evolution led of necessity to a democratization of higher education, making it
accessible to the masses through systems of public higher education.
All of this transformed the function of
higher education from its straightforward purpose in an agrarian society. It now had to aid in the preparation of
students for a diverse world of work. And
with this transformation, the role of the liberal arts shifted from a position
of unchallenged centrality to one where it must develop core competencies, skills,
and habits of mind that enable students to succeed in a complex environment and
strengthen their ability to learn and change across their lifespan. One
manifestation of this functional shift has been the labeling of the basic set
liberal arts disciplines as “General Education.”
As I have discussed in previous posts, higher
education as a whole has not kept pace with what society needs it to do in this
regard. There are two basic issues. The first is that traditional higher
education has continued to treat the liberal arts, now General Education, as
separate and distinct from courses of study that lead to professions (aka jobs
or vocations). This ignores the fact
that professionals in business, healthcare, or IT, for example, need the basic
worldview provided by the liberal arts in order to function as contributing
members of society.
Second, traditional higher education has
ignored (even denied) the fact that
today’s student is substantially different
from that of previous generations. The 18-yeaar-old student fresh from high
school is no longer the norm. Students are, for instance, now older, work full-
or part-time, and have familial obligations.
In other words, they already have experience in the real world and have de
facto mastered many of the theoretical constructs that are in the realm of
General Education.
So the question becomes how to keep the
liberal arts and General Education relevant and intrinsically valuable. The answer is not to stubbornly insist that
this body of knowledge needs to be APPLIED TO professional preparation. Rather, it must be INTEGRATED in a
comprehensive approach to prepare students for the realities of a rapidly changing
cultural milieu. To accomplish this, we
must first acknowledge the role of General education in the education process,
and recognize who our students are. We
can then tailor the experience with course and credit requirements that
encourage and promote exposure to a broad range of human learning.
More to come….
Comments
Post a Comment