Non-Traditional Students: New Research, Old Results
A current
article by Meris Stansbury in eCampus News (“Is it time to rethink the term
nontraditional student?”) cites recently released data (not recent data) from
the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in suggesting that we need
to take a closer look at traditional vs. nontraditional students. The data include characteristics of
postsecondary nontraditional students, e.g., having one or more dependents, and
being employed full-time. Additional
data show percentages of students who fit the nontraditional profile. All of the data points to an increasing
number of students who fall into the nontraditional category. The article
concludes that the definition of a traditional student may be outdated, and
that institutions should be doing more to serve the nontraditional population.
While the
article itself and the NCES data are accurate, they are both sadly out of
date. The article notes that the NCES
data show essentially the same results as the data from 20 years ago. Further,
the “new” data come from a study of students in 2011-12. So it isn’t time to
rethink the term. It is time to ask why
higher education (and those who report on it) has remained monolithic for two
decades. The salient fact is that the
profile of American students has changed—and not recently. So the question to be asked is not whether it
is time to rethink the definition of nontraditional student. The question is why higher education has
failed to do so for so long. We need to stop doing research and do SOMETHING.
Comments
Post a Comment